Beverage Spectrum Logo
Subscribe Now
March 2008 > Feature
Email To A Friend  Email  |  Printable Version  Print

Bottle Bills

By Matt Casey

<< Previous 1 2 3 


McLaughlin argues that the nickel should be a darn sight more. A nickel in 1975 would be worth 21 cents in today’s money, but the drop in incentive goes beyond the nickel’s value. During the 70s, vending machines dispensed cans of soda for about 40 cents each. At that price the deposit – taking the total cost of the 12 oz beverage to 45 cents – would account for about 11 percent of the total purchase price. Today, 20oz bottles can sell for $2 or more, and the still-unchanged deposit accounts for about 2.5 percent of that total. That leaves busy consumers with a vanishingly small incentive to hold on to their empty containers, and that diminishing incentive stretches up the supply chain.

Every nickel paid to a consumer for returning an empty container makes a round trip – at least on paper. Consumers hand the store a nickel when they buy the still-sealed beverage. The store, in return, passes that nickel to the distributor. Then the consumer returns the empty container. The store returns the deposit, and the distributor reimburses the store – adding a small handing fee for the store’s time and trouble in dealing with the empty container. But the key word here is small. The laws dictate that stores be paid a handling fee of 1-3 cents per container, which has remained static just as long as the nickel deposit has.

“It’s hard to find someone that hasn’t had a raise in 30 years,” McLaughlin said. That low handling fee has also made it difficult for standalone redemption centers to stay in business.

In New York, the climate for redemption centers could improve if legislators there pass a bill currently active in the General Assembly. The bill would increase the state’s handling fee from 2 cents per container to 3.5 cents per container, and expand the state’s bottle bill to cover a broader range of beverages. That last part makes Jim Calvin nervous.

Calvin, the president of the New York Association of Convenience Stores, said store operators already struggle under the burden of returned beer and soda containers. Their stores are already packed tight, Calvin said, and they don’t need –or want –to handle empty sports drink, juice and bottled water containers.

Store operators have few options, Calvin said, and most can’t afford machines to accept and process containers for them. Even if they could, he said, the noise generated by reverse vending machines make them a prohibitive nuisance in a 3,000 square foot store.

That leaves clerks to handle each return by hand, Calvin said, creating delays in a venue where consumers demand rapid service. It also leaves store operators with the problem of stashing full-sized empty containers at a time when they are trying to increase their fresh food offerings. Calvin said separating empty containers from fresh food – both physically and mentally – poses a problem. Stacks of stinky, moldy, bottles and cans don’t exactly fit with the “fresh” image, he said. “A handling fee of any amount would not eliminate the problem of insufficient storage space or the problem of compromised sanitation,” Calvin said. “It’s a nuisance that convenience store operators deal with because they’re obligated to deal with it under the law.” Calvin said that he’s been happy that convenience stores and their beverage industry allies have been able to defeat the New York proposal in the last four years. He feels like bottle-bill supporters are trying to shove the burden of dealing with returned containers onto retailers. He said he would rather see the state establish a network of redemption centers before expanding the law. He did not, however, have any idea how the state could do that.

McLaughlin called Calvin’s idea impractical. Investors, she said, couldn’t be expected to open a business that would be dependent on not-yet passed legislation, but she said she sympathized with convenience store owners. To a point.

“You can make the decision to sell it or not sell it,” McLaughlin said, and if stores decide to sell beverages –as most do – “they have to accept the responsibility for taking the stuff back.”

Email To A Friend  Email  |  Printable Version  Print
<< Previous 1 2 3 
There are currently 0 comments on this article
Leave a Comment
 Name (required)  
 Email (required but will not be published)  
Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.
 





BevNet Beverage Spectrum Logo