Beverage Spectrum Logo
Subscribe Now
May June 2007 > Cover Story
Email To A Friend  Email  |  Printable Version  Print

Too Extreme?

By Jeffrey Klineman


It’s Hard To Handle Hardcore Energy

In nearly every respect, it was a rosy year for energy drinks. Salesfi remained high, the category continued to expand, and a parade offi new drinks and hybrids found their way to market.

Despite their youth, energy drinks have become as mainstream a partfi of the beverage economy as any other product. Rockstar sales reps holdfi tastings in corporate cafeterias; Monster is marketing a coffee/energyfi hybrid; Pimp Juice is hyping its antioxidant content. Projections showfi the category could hit $10 billion by 2010.

Things should continue to go well. If, that is, consumers can stay outfi of the emergency room. Because last year brought some of the worstfi headlines the category has seen to date. A pair of well-documented healthfi scares – and a product named for an addictive street drug – brought afi deeper, panicked level of scrutiny to the manufacture and marketingfi of energy drinks. At a time when Americans’ concerns about caffeinefi consumption are growing and functional beverages and foods are undergoingfi government review, it may be that the future of the energy drinkfi category is hazier than it appears.

What’s causing the negative attention? In the past year, it’s been a triofi of energy drinks whose pumped-up caffeine content (more than 30 mgfi per fluid ounce – between three and four times that of a typical energyfi drink) has led some industry members to assess them as a new segmentfi – Extreme. Two of the products, Spike Shooter and Redline, are madefi by nutritional supplement companies. Both caused national headlinesfi when, after drinking them, consumers were hospitalized with symptomsfi resembling caffeine overdoses. A third drink, Cocaine, caused a tempestfi in a slim can due to its inflammatory name.

As a result, the image of energy drinks – always more motocrossfi than merry-go-round – has sustained some damage. And the possibilityfi of another acute reaction – or another wave of bad press – is causingfi some industry observers to look with concern at the extreme end offi the energy spectrum.

“We talk about it a lot,” said James Foster, who runs thefi Web site EnergyFiend.com, which tracks caffeine in beveragesfi and has become a resource for consumers and thefi media. “All there needs is one bad accident to happen, justfi one event where someone gets damaged, and the whole categoryfi is going to come under scrutiny in a negative way.”

Regulation, Inside and Out

This spring, a group of beverage marketing executivesfi gathered in the offices of the American Beverage Associationfi (ABA), the first members of a new committee onfi energy drinks. Caffeine concerns were of paramount importance,fi according to Kevin Keane, the ABA’s Vice Presidentfi of Communications.

“It’s a growing category, and we need to be smarter withfi those issues,” Keane said, adding that caffeine “was the bigfi thing we were dealing with.”

The end result of the meeting was a recommendation that ABAfi members begin disclosing caffeine content voluntarily, which echoedfi choices by the Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo to start divulging the caffeinefi content of their products.

The recommendation wasn’t made with any of the extremefi products in mind – none of their manufacturers arefi ABA members. But the ABA has a long history of fightingfi back against regulation, taking on criticism of the use offi High-Fructose Corn Syrup and sodas in schools with equalfi aplomb. That the group recommended caffeine disclosurefi for its energy drink making members so quickly indicatesfi its awareness of the potential for a public relations debacle.

“Our industry sent a message, in the way they approvedfi this voluntary labeling and put the issue front and center,”fi Keane said.

As for extreme products, he added, the jury is still out.

“It’s something that people are aware of, but concernfi hasn’t reached a high level yet,” he said. “The consumers arefi making their judgment with regard to them. It’s such a newfi category, it’s still growing, and everyone’s seeing how thingsfi are going to progress. And you don’t want to overreact tofi things, either. I mean, it’s an energy drink.”

Email To A Friend  Email  |  Printable Version  Print
2 3 Next >>
There are currently 0 comments on this article
Leave a Comment
 Name (required)  
 Email (required but will not be published)  
Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.
 





BevNet Beverage Spectrum Logo